Sometimes one ends up in one's local DVD shop determined, despite the slim pickings on offer, to rent a film no matter what. Such was the situation we found ourselves in last night as we scoured shelves barren of anything to get too excited about. In the end we settled for the kind of thing one only reaches for in times of desperation - The Exorcism of Emily Rose.1
As far as most contemporary horror is concerned, my expectations are so low that I sometimes run the risk of confusing the "not terrible" with the "good". While I wouldn’t go as far as to call Emily Rose good, it's not offensively bad either…and one often finds oneself grateful for such small mercies.
Its chief failing is a rather surprising one in a film that deals with the juicy subject of demonic possession - its simply rather tepid and bland, with effective shocks/scares at a definite premium. While it's eschewal of rotating head/projectile vomiting theatrics in favour of something more restrained/'realistic' initially feels quite refreshing, its sporadic attempts at supernatural creepiness fail to offer a remotely satisfying alternative (at least in horror terms).
The general air of gentle tedium is compounded by lengthy, "Movie of the Week", courtroom scenes that might have served as interesting counterpoints to the horror flashbacks if the flashbacks themselves hadn’t been almost equally timid and mild. Thus what we're left with is the closest thing to a "Family-friendly" exorcism movie one is likely to get - an ambling, rambling tale of teenage possession, heavy on cries of "Sustained" and notably light on shrieks of "Your mother sucks cocks in hell!"
With the current trend for remakes of visceral 70s horror films2 (The Hills Have Eyes etc.) continuing apace, attempts to buck the trend and produce original, intelligent, low-gore horrors that rely on lingering dread, uneasiness, eeriness etc., would certainly be welcome. Emily Rose skips the gore and the teen-horror conventions but…that's pretty much all it has to offer. It leaves familiar ingredients out, but neglects to add anything else back into the mix.
It's been a long, long time since I saw anything I could confidently describe as (that most elusive of things) an effective 'adult horror'3 - the search continues…
Tags: Emily Rose, Exorcism, horror, cinema, film
- Very, very loosely based on the case of Anneliese Michel, a "German woman who believed she was possessed by six or more demons". [back]
- Or films that share a certain 70s aesthetic - a la Wolf Creek [back]
- I am not, of course, referring to the porno appropriation of the word ‘adult’ here. [back]

Heathrow, now there’s a horror movie that begs to be made.
On that note, in the small hours of tomorrow morning I head off to Paddy’s green shamrock shore for to thicken the accent and flog the shite out of some lake or other down wesht.
Fústar, Copernicus - you may well be hearing from me.
You have been warned.
April 11th, 2006 at 3:13 pmEmail me at theapothecaryguy at yahoo dot co dot uk, foolhardy not work as I won’t be darkening my desk for a couple of weeks.
Text me when you get to Dublin, so I can get the hell out of town.
April 11th, 2006 at 5:15 pmYou should watch a film called ‘The Descent’. I only ended up seeing it because there was nothing else on one evening in the UGC. Anyway I usually roll around laughing at horror films but ‘The Descent’ almost had me crawling up the walls in terrror at times. It is also a classic gore fest. It does get a bit daft towards the end but for genuinely effective ‘adult horror’ film it hits the mark spot on.
April 13th, 2006 at 3:57 pmHad forgotten about The Descent. I saw it a while back Padraig and, despite a few reservations, enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would. Pretty damn claustrophobic and genuinely scary at times. Thematically it was a bit clunky (and obvious), but I guess it qualifies as an ‘adult’ work alright…
April 13th, 2006 at 4:59 pm