<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joystick Waggling and Button Bashing: Memoirs, Pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott shrive</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-73083</link>
		<dc:creator>scott shrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-73083</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. You have my word that I use no cheats. That being said, the 7:55 in the 100M was on a standup machine.The 8:07 was mame...no cheats just 6 fingers tappin away.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. You have my word that I use no cheats. That being said, the 7:55 in the 100M was on a standup machine.The 8:07 was mame&#8230;no cheats just 6 fingers tappin away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-72921</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-72921</guid>
		<description>Scott, Records only count when played on a standard arcade machine. On this matter there can be no compromise. PC cheats can probably allow you to (in the manner of photons) arrive at the finishing line before the gun even sounds, thus achieving a negative time. Quantum physics meets pixellated Olympics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, Records only count when played on a standard arcade machine. On this matter there can be no compromise. PC cheats can probably allow you to (in the manner of photons) arrive at the finishing line before the gun even sounds, thus achieving a negative time. Quantum physics meets pixellated Olympics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott shrive</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-72905</link>
		<dc:creator>scott shrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-72905</guid>
		<description>I downloaded the MAME version for my PC....Trying to use the keyboard was impossible....so I used my Saitek controller, using the shoulder buttons as the run buttons.
I didn't get 7.55......but I managed an 8.07 on the 100M dash.
Hey, in fairness, I am 38...hahaha.....even Babe Ruth stopped hitting homeruns.....lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded the MAME version for my PC&#8230;.Trying to use the keyboard was impossible&#8230;.so I used my Saitek controller, using the shoulder buttons as the run buttons.<br />
I didn&#8217;t get 7.55&#8230;&#8230;but I managed an 8.07 on the 100M dash.<br />
Hey, in fairness, I am 38&#8230;hahaha&#8230;..even Babe Ruth stopped hitting homeruns&#8230;..lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-70734</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-70734</guid>
		<description>7.55 seconds?! Holy crapopolis. 

Your little moustachioed chap must have been downing the steroids like nobody's business. I'm surprised that you (or he) are still alive to tell the tale.

I too would dearly love a cabinet for my basement. I need to get a basement first of course, but there's no harm in dreaming.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.55 seconds?! Holy crapopolis. </p>
<p>Your little moustachioed chap must have been downing the steroids like nobody&#8217;s business. I&#8217;m surprised that you (or he) are still alive to tell the tale.</p>
<p>I too would dearly love a cabinet for my basement. I need to get a basement first of course, but there&#8217;s no harm in dreaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott shrive</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-70402</link>
		<dc:creator>scott shrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-70402</guid>
		<description>I was reading this post with a smile. I played Hyper Olympics/Track and Field more than any human alive....lol....I used three fingers on my left hand and three fingers on my right hand, in a rat-a-tat drumming motion. I found a machine I hadn't played in 8 years that still had all my records....the name FUZ, as an hommage to my police officer Dad. I could run the 100m in 7.55 seconds. I wish I could find the standup cabinet game for my basement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading this post with a smile. I played Hyper Olympics/Track and Field more than any human alive&#8230;.lol&#8230;.I used three fingers on my left hand and three fingers on my right hand, in a rat-a-tat drumming motion. I found a machine I hadn&#8217;t played in 8 years that still had all my records&#8230;.the name FUZ, as an hommage to my police officer Dad. I could run the 100m in 7.55 seconds. I wish I could find the standup cabinet game for my basement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51984</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51984</guid>
		<description>Er...sorry for confusing you James. Obviously foolhardy is someone else! I'm not here talking to myself. I just meant I'm the sole author of the blog (if you see what I mean).

Now back to breaking my 110m hurdles record...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er&#8230;sorry for confusing you James. Obviously foolhardy is someone else! I&#8217;m not here talking to myself. I just meant I&#8217;m the sole author of the blog (if you see what I mean).</p>
<p>Now back to breaking my 110m hurdles record&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51981</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51981</guid>
		<description>You are both 'foolhardy' and 'fústar' ? wow

anyway thanks a lot for those nice words, I'll be waiting for those records! 

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are both &#8216;foolhardy&#8217; and &#8216;fústar&#8217; ? wow</p>
<p>anyway thanks a lot for those nice words, I&#8217;ll be waiting for those records! </p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51450</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51450</guid>
		<description>Hi James,

Actually it's "guy" (singular), just me on my ownsome.

Your site looks great by the way. Really nice clean design and some lovely images. 

Now I'm off to try and break some records...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,</p>
<p>Actually it&#8217;s &#8220;guy&#8221; (singular), just me on my ownsome.</p>
<p>Your site looks great by the way. Really nice clean design and some lovely images. </p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m off to try and break some records&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51345</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 20:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-51345</guid>
		<description>Hello guys, I followed a link from wikipedia to this site. I just want to tell you that I finished a very detailed guide on Track And Field.

If you are interested it is at:

http://www.cincinato.org/trackandfield/

(right now is a spanish-english mix, a pure 100% english version is on the way.)

I am specially interested in the records from people out there, so If you want to send me your marks I will gladly add them to the score board!

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello guys, I followed a link from wikipedia to this site. I just want to tell you that I finished a very detailed guide on Track And Field.</p>
<p>If you are interested it is at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cincinato.org/trackandfield/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cincinato.org/trackandfield/</a></p>
<p>(right now is a spanish-english mix, a pure 100% english version is on the way.)</p>
<p>I am specially interested in the records from people out there, so If you want to send me your marks I will gladly add them to the score board!</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolhardy</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49730</link>
		<dc:creator>foolhardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49730</guid>
		<description>Tell me about it.
My initial campaign ran with the slogan:
         Back to the Future with BetaMax!™

Pretty snappy no? Didn't work out though, thus the more in-your-face approach you mentioned.

As I say, people haven't a clue.

As for DVD (Dirty Venereal Disease) users, I think I called them "Clap addled, moronic sub-human scum"
They babble on like drunk children about picture quality! Quality! Quality!? I'm offering quantity and these clowns are thinking quality. Have you seen the size of a DVD? They're tiny! You could choke a hippo with a BetaMax! cassette. Now, that's what I'm talking about.

Regarding "Blu-ray" and "HD DVD" - whatever the hell they are,  they're fads just like the rest of them. Mark my words, BetaMax!™ is the future. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me about it.<br />
My initial campaign ran with the slogan:<br />
         Back to the Future with BetaMax!™</p>
<p>Pretty snappy no? Didn&#8217;t work out though, thus the more in-your-face approach you mentioned.</p>
<p>As I say, people haven&#8217;t a clue.</p>
<p>As for DVD (Dirty Venereal Disease) users, I think I called them &#8220;Clap addled, moronic sub-human scum&#8221;<br />
They babble on like drunk children about picture quality! Quality! Quality!? I&#8217;m offering quantity and these clowns are thinking quality. Have you seen the size of a DVD? They&#8217;re tiny! You could choke a hippo with a BetaMax! cassette. Now, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
<p>Regarding &#8220;Blu-ray&#8221; and &#8220;HD DVD&#8221; - whatever the hell they are,  they&#8217;re fads just like the rest of them. Mark my words, BetaMax!™ is the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49528</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49528</guid>
		<description>I just thought that the ad you wanted to place in the &lt;a href="http://www.westernpeople.ie/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Western People&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; sounded a tad aggressive:

&lt;blockquote&gt;BetaMaxing the shit out of Mayo, one DVD at a time!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Also, your penchant for calling DVD users "Moronic, sub-human scum" was never likely to win you many admirers.

You're too retro. Get with the programme and become "now-tro".

I can only imagine what you'd have to say about Blu-ray and HD DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just thought that the ad you wanted to place in the <a href="http://www.westernpeople.ie/"><em>Western People</em></a> sounded a tad aggressive:</p>
<blockquote><p>BetaMaxing the shit out of Mayo, one DVD at a time!</p></blockquote>
<p>Also, your penchant for calling DVD users &#8220;Moronic, sub-human scum&#8221; was never likely to win you many admirers.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re too retro. Get with the programme and become &#8220;now-tro&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can only imagine what you&#8217;d have to say about Blu-ray and HD DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolhardy</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49521</link>
		<dc:creator>foolhardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49521</guid>
		<description>That Betamax (or BetaMax!™ as I like to call it ) conversion service never really took off. 

People haven't a clue. I'm prepared to bide my time though and we'll see how they like it when, in their time of need, I turn my back on them and move BetaMax!™ to fucking Claremorris!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Betamax (or BetaMax!™ as I like to call it ) conversion service never really took off. </p>
<p>People haven&#8217;t a clue. I&#8217;m prepared to bide my time though and we&#8217;ll see how they like it when, in their time of need, I turn my back on them and move BetaMax!™ to fucking Claremorris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49515</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49515</guid>
		<description>You're a divil for the Betamax all right. Sure didn't you plan to set up a business in Castlebar for people who wanted to convert their DVDs &lt;em&gt;back into&lt;/em&gt; Betamax? I still maintain it's a niche market...

Brevity is probably more of an issue for comedies, I think, for obvious reasons. It's easy for the humour to be become strained and tired after 7 or 8 years. Having said that, there are exceptions. The above-mentioned &lt;em&gt;Seinfeld&lt;/em&gt; (for example) pretty much sustained itself in robust comedic health for 9 seasons. &lt;em&gt;The Simpsons&lt;/em&gt;, on the other hand, now feels terribly jaded much of the time (at least when I get a chance to watch an episode, which isn't that often).

As for &lt;em&gt;The Late Late&lt;/em&gt; - it's a bit like the experience of going to mass for a certain section of the population. You do it because you’ve always done it (even though it’s not very enjoyable).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a divil for the Betamax all right. Sure didn&#8217;t you plan to set up a business in Castlebar for people who wanted to convert their DVDs <em>back into</em> Betamax? I still maintain it&#8217;s a niche market&#8230;</p>
<p>Brevity is probably more of an issue for comedies, I think, for obvious reasons. It&#8217;s easy for the humour to be become strained and tired after 7 or 8 years. Having said that, there are exceptions. The above-mentioned <em>Seinfeld</em> (for example) pretty much sustained itself in robust comedic health for 9 seasons. <em>The Simpsons</em>, on the other hand, now feels terribly jaded much of the time (at least when I get a chance to watch an episode, which isn&#8217;t that often).</p>
<p>As for <em>The Late Late</em> - it&#8217;s a bit like the experience of going to mass for a certain section of the population. You do it because you’ve always done it (even though it’s not very enjoyable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolhardy</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49502</link>
		<dc:creator>foolhardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49502</guid>
		<description>Cop Rock - DVD my arse, I have it on VHS AND Betamax. Old School. I know a guy who knows a guy who reckons he can get me the original film stock too, at a price.

From your list of non-shark jumpers one thing stands out - neither Fawlty Towers, Spaced nor The Office went beyond 2 seasons. So, is brevity the source of quality then?

If so, how do you explain the anomaly that is The Late Late Show? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cop Rock - DVD my arse, I have it on VHS AND Betamax. Old School. I know a guy who knows a guy who reckons he can get me the original film stock too, at a price.</p>
<p>From your list of non-shark jumpers one thing stands out - neither Fawlty Towers, Spaced nor The Office went beyond 2 seasons. So, is brevity the source of quality then?</p>
<p>If so, how do you explain the anomaly that is The Late Late Show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fústar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49436</link>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/01/16/208/#comment-49436</guid>
		<description>Well since &lt;em&gt;The Colbys&lt;/em&gt; never really had a peak to begin with it, it's hard to say when it passed it. Still I suppose most people would point to the Alien abduction episode (&lt;em&gt;yes&lt;/em&gt;, I used to watch it) as the one in which it lept several hundred feet over the shark.

&lt;em&gt;Fawlty Towers&lt;/em&gt; never came near the shark. Nor did &lt;em&gt;Spaced&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;The Office&lt;/em&gt; (to name 2 other fine British comedies). &lt;em&gt;This is Alan Partridge&lt;/em&gt; did a bit of shark leaping in the 2nd season alas, with the introduction of a Russian girlfriend and generally broader (and less funny) tone.

&lt;em&gt;Cop Rock&lt;/em&gt;?! You tell me. You have the whole thing on DVD.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well since <em>The Colbys</em> never really had a peak to begin with it, it&#8217;s hard to say when it passed it. Still I suppose most people would point to the Alien abduction episode (<em>yes</em>, I used to watch it) as the one in which it lept several hundred feet over the shark.</p>
<p><em>Fawlty Towers</em> never came near the shark. Nor did <em>Spaced</em> or <em>The Office</em> (to name 2 other fine British comedies). <em>This is Alan Partridge</em> did a bit of shark leaping in the 2nd season alas, with the introduction of a Russian girlfriend and generally broader (and less funny) tone.</p>
<p><em>Cop Rock</em>?! You tell me. You have the whole thing on DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
