<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the Yellow God Forever Gazes Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/</link>
	<description>Recycling Cultural Waste Since 2005...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fÃºstar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/comment-page-1/#comment-72341</link>
		<dc:creator>fÃºstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/03/18/234/#comment-72341</guid>
		<description>Marilyn, you&#039;re most welcome - though I&#039;d probably hesitate to call J Milton Hayes a &quot;giant&quot; of poetry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn, you&#8217;re most welcome &#8211; though I&#8217;d probably hesitate to call J Milton Hayes a &#8220;giant&#8221; of poetry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/comment-page-1/#comment-71699</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/03/18/234/#comment-71699</guid>
		<description>I love reading this old material, from the giants of poetry, many years ago, and really enjoy a connection to the past and remember watching my Dad recite this poem along with others from Kipling and the like.  Many thanks for keeping it alive for you have kept part of my Father alive for me!  Thanks again, Marilyn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love reading this old material, from the giants of poetry, many years ago, and really enjoy a connection to the past and remember watching my Dad recite this poem along with others from Kipling and the like.  Many thanks for keeping it alive for you have kept part of my Father alive for me!  Thanks again, Marilyn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fÃºstar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/comment-page-1/#comment-58746</link>
		<dc:creator>fÃºstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/03/18/234/#comment-58746</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The poem seems to have a certain resonance today as it is really about a &#8216;clash of civilizations&#8217;. Mad Carew desecrates a cult statue and is killed by the guardians of the shrine who no doubt believe that they are dispensing divine retribution, but the killing resolves nothing. At the end the statue is still an &#8216;idol&#8217; and the green eye has not been returned.</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s a meaty New York Times article in that. Get busy. My feeling when I heard it as a child was that Mad Carew got his just desserts. As our parish priest used to say, &#8220;Don&#8217;t fuck with another man&#8217;s idol&#8221;. Wise words.</p>
<p>In his passion and maverick tempestuousness Mad Carew is a &#8220;bad boy&#8221; straight out of the lustiest bodice-ripper. Perhaps, then, the poem is less a fable about the potential danger(s) of a cultural faux-pas, and more a satire on (moronic) imperialist male â€œheroismâ€?.</p>
<blockquote><p>And how sexist it is! </p></blockquote>
<p>Iâ€™d always thought so. Reading it again, however, Iâ€™m not so sure. After all she â€œjestinglyâ€? tells him that she <em>simply must</em> have the yellow eye. When he turns up battered and bloody with the yoke in his pocket her first thoughts may well have been, â€œWhat an idiot!â€? Of course itâ€™s implied that though she chided him for his folly, she couldnâ€™t help but be moved/seduced by his devotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ithaca</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/comment-page-1/#comment-58647</link>
		<dc:creator>Ithaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/03/18/234/#comment-58647</guid>
		<description>I remember hearing &#039;The Green Eye&#039; on the wireless when I was a child and my parents had heard it when they were growing up in the 1920&#039;s

The use of the word &#039;idol&#039; is interesting as it implies that veneration of the image is immoral.  It is a word that is often used by members of iconoclast religions traditions to assert their moral superiority over iconodule traditions.  

The poem seems to have a certain resonance today as it is really about a &#039;clash of civilizations&#039;.  Mad Carew desecrates a cult statue and is killed by the guardians of the shrine who no doubt believe that they are dispensing divine retribution, but the killing resolves nothing.  At the end the statue is still an &#039;idol&#039; and the green eye has not been returned.

And how sexist it is!  The Colonel&#039;s daughter is a latter day Eve who first comes up with the idea of stealing the eye and encourages Carew and to add insult to injury she refuses to accept it when he gives it to her - la donna e mobile... etc etc...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing &#8216;The Green Eye&#8217; on the wireless when I was a child and my parents had heard it when they were growing up in the 1920&#8242;s</p>
<p>The use of the word &#8216;idol&#8217; is interesting as it implies that veneration of the image is immoral.  It is a word that is often used by members of iconoclast religions traditions to assert their moral superiority over iconodule traditions.  </p>
<p>The poem seems to have a certain resonance today as it is really about a &#8216;clash of civilizations&#8217;.  Mad Carew desecrates a cult statue and is killed by the guardians of the shrine who no doubt believe that they are dispensing divine retribution, but the killing resolves nothing.  At the end the statue is still an &#8216;idol&#8217; and the green eye has not been returned.</p>
<p>And how sexist it is!  The Colonel&#8217;s daughter is a latter day Eve who first comes up with the idea of stealing the eye and encourages Carew and to add insult to injury she refuses to accept it when he gives it to her &#8211; la donna e mobile&#8230; etc etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fÃºstar</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/comment-page-1/#comment-58440</link>
		<dc:creator>fÃºstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/03/18/234/#comment-58440</guid>
		<description>You remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://oldpoetry.com/oauthor/show/J_Milton_Hayes&quot;&gt;the sketch&lt;/a&gt; well, only it wasn&#039;t The Goons:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Poems like this were once very well known, so well known in fact, that they became objects of parody. The vaudeville comedian, Roy Rene, better known as Mo, used to perform a sketch in which he endeavoured to recite &#039;The Green Eye of the Little Yellow God&#039;, only to be constantly interrupted by hecklers dressed as ex-Indian Army officers planted in the audience. In frustration, Mo would explode with &#039;Oh this is lovely! This is beautiful! A gentleman and a scholar canâ€™t get up to resuscitate an immoral piece of poultry without being got at!&#039;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m trying to remember what Bertie Wooster used to consider the poems and songs of 2nd rate stage hacks... May have to consult the library.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You remember <a href="http://oldpoetry.com/oauthor/show/J_Milton_Hayes">the sketch</a> well, only it wasn&#8217;t The Goons:</p>
<blockquote><p>Poems like this were once very well known, so well known in fact, that they became objects of parody. The vaudeville comedian, Roy Rene, better known as Mo, used to perform a sketch in which he endeavoured to recite &#8216;The Green Eye of the Little Yellow God&#8217;, only to be constantly interrupted by hecklers dressed as ex-Indian Army officers planted in the audience. In frustration, Mo would explode with &#8216;Oh this is lovely! This is beautiful! A gentleman and a scholar canâ€™t get up to resuscitate an immoral piece of poultry without being got at!&#8217;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to remember what Bertie Wooster used to consider the poems and songs of 2nd rate stage hacks&#8230; May have to consult the library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon McGarr</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/03/18/234/comment-page-1/#comment-58437</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon McGarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.org/2007/03/18/234/#comment-58437</guid>
		<description>The piece of Yellow Eye related poetry is the centrepiece of a post music-hall BBC radio sketch, possibly by the Goons. It centres around the narrator&#039;s inability to finish the poem in the face of increasingly absurd interruptions.

This was the only context I had ever come across the poem and presumed that it was invented for added absurd effect for the sketch. 

I now realise that it was presumed that the listeners would know the poem off by heart anyway. It must have been a cliche of the second rate stage declaimer. (Not a category I place your grandmother in, I hasten to add)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The piece of Yellow Eye related poetry is the centrepiece of a post music-hall BBC radio sketch, possibly by the Goons. It centres around the narrator&#8217;s inability to finish the poem in the face of increasingly absurd interruptions.</p>
<p>This was the only context I had ever come across the poem and presumed that it was invented for added absurd effect for the sketch. </p>
<p>I now realise that it was presumed that the listeners would know the poem off by heart anyway. It must have been a cliche of the second rate stage declaimer. (Not a category I place your grandmother in, I hasten to add)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

