<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manky Art Thursday: The Spirit of Duty Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fustar.info/2007/12/20/manky-art-wednesday-the-spirit-of-duty-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/12/20/manky-art-wednesday-the-spirit-of-duty-free/</link>
	<description>Recycling Cultural Waste Since 2005...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Image at the End of the Multiverse - Fustar &#8211; Recycling Cultural Waste Since 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2007/12/20/manky-art-wednesday-the-spirit-of-duty-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1017515</link>
		<dc:creator>The Image at the End of the Multiverse - Fustar &#8211; Recycling Cultural Waste Since 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.info/2007/12/20/manky-art-wednesday-the-spirit-of-duty-free/#comment-1017515</guid>
		<description>[...] Part of the University of Limerick&#039;s &quot;National Self Portrait Collection of Ireland&quot;, it was plonked (with little ceremony and less regard to the aesthetics of display) in a corridor and on an austere, breeze-blocked wall. In as much as you&#039;re ever aware of (or engaged with) the imagery you whizz by daily &#8211; my initial impressions were simply of a 70s, airbrushed thing. A crass and kitsch thing. A piece of &quot;bad art&quot;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part of the University of Limerick&#039;s &quot;National Self Portrait Collection of Ireland&quot;, it was plonked (with little ceremony and less regard to the aesthetics of display) in a corridor and on an austere, breeze-blocked wall. In as much as you&#039;re ever aware of (or engaged with) the imagery you whizz by daily &#8211; my initial impressions were simply of a 70s, airbrushed thing. A crass and kitsch thing. A piece of &quot;bad art&quot;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

