<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fustar &#187; satire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fustar.info/tag/satire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fustar.info</link>
	<description>Recycling Cultural Waste Since 2005...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pissing on Bishops: 21st Century Obscenity &amp; the State of the Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.fustar.info/2009/03/04/pissing-on-bishops-21st-century-obscenity-the-state-of-the-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fustar.info/2009/03/04/pissing-on-bishops-21st-century-obscenity-the-state-of-the-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fústar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political/Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fustar.info/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obscenity. Profanity. Transgression. All these lovely things have been much on my mind of late. Not entirely sure why. It may have something to do with a new blogging project that has "cunts" (phnarr) in the title. It may, instead,&#8230;  <a href="http://www.fustar.info/2009/03/04/pissing-on-bishops-21st-century-obscenity-the-state-of-the-nation/">continue reading</a> &#187;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obscenity. Profanity. Transgression. All these lovely things have been much on my mind of late. Not entirely sure why. </p>
<p>It may have something to do with a <a href="http://whingingrecessioncunts.wordpress.com/">new blogging project</a> that has "cunts" (phnarr) in the title. It may, instead, be related to the fact that I'm reading a book about <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/sep/28/scienceandnature">shit</a>. <em>Or</em>, it could, simply, be all down to the omnipresent recession. Everything else is.</p>
<p>Anyway, it struck me, the other day, that I'd <em>no idea</em> what the legal definition of “obscenity" is in 21st century Ireland. Could, for example, one be fined/jailed for obscene acts &#038; works? Did “obscenity", as a legal concept, even exist anymore?</p>
<p>In a bid to answer these vexing questions I did what any serious researcher and seeker after knowledge would. I asked my "followers" on <a href="http://twitter.com/fustar">Twitter</a>. <a href="http://twitter.com/Fergal">Follower Crehan</a> pointed me in the direction of the <a href="http://acts.oireachtas.ie/print/zza21y1929.1.html"><em>1929 Censorship of Publications Act</em></a> – a document that contains the following choice nugget RE: “indecency".</p>
<blockquote><p>the word "indecent" shall be construed as including suggestive of, or inciting to sexual immorality or unnatural vice or likely in any other similar way to corrupt or deprave.</p></blockquote>
<p>Before you chortle, roll the eyes affectionately, and say “Ah! The old days!", bear in mind that the above definition is (<a href="http://twitter.com/Fergal">Follower Crehan</a> assures me) still (<em>still!</em>) the law. God bless the state that, in its infinite wisdom, protects us from the corrupting durtiness of sex. With a stabilising and paternal hand it pours cold waters on our raging mickies. Without it we would, surely, be wanking openly in the streets and rutting passers-by like drooling pigs in heat. Christ&#8230;we're filthy bastards altogether.</p>
<p>Later that day, <a href="http://twitter.com/Tupp_Ed">Follower McGarr</a> telephoned me as I chewed contemplatively on an elevenses sausage. Between mouthfuls of meat (waaa!) we discussed (among other things) Alan Moore's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Girls"><em>Lost Girls</em></a>, <em>The Daily Mail</em> (but of course), and (for reasons I can't precisely recall) the laxity of tax legislation. All very pleasant and diverting but, with appetite whetted, I wanted more.</p>
<p>So, in a half-assed amateur looky-uppy spirit, I opened a few books. First port of call was <em>Murdoch's Dictionary of Irish Law</em> (5th ed). “Obscenity" led on (as it does) to “Indecency" where the following was found.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Indecency – Any act which offends modesty, causes scandal or injures the morals of the community.<br />
[...]<br />
The publication or utterance of indecent matter is an offence and is required to be punishable by law.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now I've always thought (Satan-worshiping lover of depravity that I am) that one of the functions (nay, <em>duties</em>) of art is to be unsettling, upsetting, challenging, discombobulating etc. There are plenty of community “morals" that I'd enjoy seeing “injured", and let's not forget scandal-causing: one of the most entertaining acts a human/artist can engage in. Yet, it turns out, such things are <em>required</em> to be punishable by law. Take <em>that</em> hippies!</p>
<p>Where's this post leading? Not sure&#8230;but I'd like to veer off on a slight tangent and mention Irish satire. One of the maddening aspects of our national “satire" (and other “subversive" forms of expression) has traditionally been how it's reigned itself in in the face of “Ah now!" culture. </p>
<p>“Ah now&#8230;you can't say that". “Ah now&#8230;that's not on". “Ah now". “Ah now".</p>
<p>Ah now? Ah fuck off.</p>
<p>The <em>perfect</em> response to (and antidote for) fat-necked Fianna Fáil soul-destroyers, banking fucknuts, <em>The Sunday Independent</em>, and all the myriad life-sapping forces that surround us is <em>not</em> cuddly ("Sure, it's all a bit of fun!") mickey-taking, but properly transgressive and (yes) even <em>obscene</em> "art" (define that how you will). Forget whoopee cushions, let's have some proper bombs. Old-timey anarchist ones. Ah now. Ah now. Kaboom!</p>
<p>Tomorrow I'll kick things off by&#8230;let's see&#8230;uhm wandering around town in a provocative t-shirt. On it will be a cartoon horse, wearing knee high boots and lipstick, pissing on a bishop. You have to start somewhere.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This, I know, has rambled, raved and meandered. But it's merely a kicking off point. An opening for a chat. Thoughts? Questions? Free legal advice? Over to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fustar.info/2009/03/04/pissing-on-bishops-21st-century-obscenity-the-state-of-the-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

